falken or hankook

Starts at the flywheel, ends at the hubs, any problems along them lines, ask your questions here.
Post Reply
Bazzab
Got muddy boots
Got muddy boots
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:37 pm

falken or hankook

Post by Bazzab » Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:44 pm

Hi, new to the site, just curious if anybo :rhinohump: dy has had any of these tyres on their suzuki? Falken la/at 96s and hankook dynapro rf 10's. Cant decide between the two so any feedback is very welcome. P.s. not using them for hardcore offroad.

User avatar
twiss
SCUK Computer Wizard
SCUK Computer Wizard
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:28 pm
Location: Birkirkara, Malta
Contact:

Re: falken or hankook

Post by twiss » Wed Oct 05, 2011 1:20 pm

Hi,

I haven't used those tyres, but have you considered slightly more aggressive AT tyres?
I'm not talking ridiculously aggressive. I'm just think that if you're buying a new set of them it might be worth spending an extra £25 or so and getting something like the Insa Turbo Traction Ranger, or even the Insa Turbo Saharas.

I used to do a lot of road miles in my SJ with Saharas on and found them to be very very good on road as well as off road.
I know for a fact that the traction rangers are a good tread pattern as well. My mate had them on his old SJ, and they're not very loud or uncomfortable on the road...

As for durability, I bought my Saharas for a set of 4 for £90 off ebay. They were already about 25% worn and lasted me 2 and half years of fairly aggressive driving, off road and on road!

Traction rangers:

Image

Saharas:

Image
Twiss

'93 Suzuki Samurai Sport 1.6 16v SU. Virtual lift, spring under, 31s
'93 Maruti Gypsy MG410

"If brute force doesn't fix your problem, you aren't using enough of it."

Bazzab
Got muddy boots
Got muddy boots
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:37 pm

Re: falken or hankook

Post by Bazzab » Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:16 pm

I shall look into that, thanks:)

Post Reply