engines

Anything Suzuki related, but not technical, it goes here!
User avatar
turbo-tom
I spend far too much time on here
I spend far too much time on here
Posts: 4478
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:29 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: engines

Post by turbo-tom » Wed Dec 25, 2013 3:45 am

Sorry to cock and ball it up but I agree with Anton. I like diesels aswell I must admit I miss my diesel engine in the suzuki because of the torque but then it lacked alot of top end speed but then now with the vitara engine I like the power it has behind it. I personally think that different enginges suit different types of trucks
Tom :)

Ford Fiesta ST :D

User avatar
ScottieJ
The Boss
The Boss
Posts: 11635
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:13 pm
Location: Chippenham, wiltshire

Re: engines

Post by ScottieJ » Wed Dec 25, 2013 2:57 pm

It's all about the gearing!! Don't forget that, you could have loads of torque but gear it wrong and it won't be useable! Likewise you can run a stock 1.3 with 38" tyres and it still be useable with the right gearing.

Anyway I'm pretty sure the 128lbs ft of the j20a is more than enough in a light Sj with dropped gearing.
Zuki Build

Steady as she goes!

User avatar
mike harris
SCUK is my life
SCUK is my life
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:30 pm
Location: hascombe Surrey

Re: engines

Post by mike harris » Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:14 pm

I was about to say scottie, it's all about gearing. I don't ever go above 2000rpm in mine, and never use full throttle. Ever......

5.125 diffs and 5.1 transfer box,makes my suzuki lower than shagging your own sister.

Gearing is a vital part in off-roading, power and speed come much further down the list.

User avatar
Jordi
Bow down before me
Bow down before me
Posts: 7535
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:35 pm
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham

Re: engines

Post by Jordi » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:02 pm

mike harris wrote: 5.125 diffs and 5.1 transfer box,makes my suzuki lower than shagging your own sister.
Eloquently put Mike.
1988 Samurai - Truck Cab & Tray Back - 1.6 8v & HIF44 - Snorkel - Stack Exhaust - PAS, YJs & 33s - Trussed, Gusseted & Pumpkin Capped Axles - 4.3 R&Ps - 4.16 T/Box - Rear Air Locker - Full Float Back Axle & Discs - RCV Front Shafts - X-Eng Handbrake - Custom Fuel Tank

User avatar
mike harris
SCUK is my life
SCUK is my life
Posts: 1828
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:30 pm
Location: hascombe Surrey

Re: engines

Post by mike harris » Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:42 pm

:)

Anton
I spend far too much time on here
I spend far too much time on here
Posts: 3859
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:12 pm
Location: London

Re: engines

Post by Anton » Wed Dec 25, 2013 11:52 pm

ScottieJ wrote:It's all about the gearing!! Don't forget that, you could have loads of torque but gear it wrong and it won't be useable! Likewise you can run a stock 1.3 with 38" tyres and it still be useable with the right gearing.

Anyway I'm pretty sure the 128lbs ft of the j20a is more than enough in a light Sj with dropped gearing.
Lower gearing serves to increase torque at the wheels, so whilst I agree that loads of torque but the wrong gearing will be a rubbish combo, and a standard 410 could pee all over such a truck - you'd have to get the gearing *very* wrong with 128ft/lb of torque before the vehicle stopped being awesome.

I'm running standard sammy gearing (standard t-case, standard gbox, standard 3.7 diffs) with a standard engine, with 31's. And while it could be better (I have a 410 t-case to go in) it's not that bad.

With double the torque, I probably wouldn't bother with my 410 t-case. I'd drop a J20 in, see how it drove, and then decide. I wouldn't mind slightly higher gearing for m-way speeds.

But for me, the 410 t-case is sitting around waiting to be used, and I have no J20. So I'll drop in the t-case, and hold on to the 413 one in case one day I get more power and decide I *still* want a rocklobster...

Because despite everything I just said, lower gearing is always better offroad! :doublethumbs:
1985 SJ413VX (SJ50V) with SPOA, rear disc brakes, 31x10.5R15 Kaiman Malatesta tyres, an MOT and a lot left to do!

My: Build thread To-do list Pay and Play map

User avatar
Edweird
Suzuki, will you marry me?
Suzuki, will you marry me?
Posts: 2531
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:04 pm
Location: Brigg, North Lincolnshire

Re: engines

Post by Edweird » Thu Dec 26, 2013 2:49 am

Anton wrote:Because despite everything I just said, lower gearing is always better offroad! :doublethumbs:
Horses for courses. Depends what you're driving, how and why. The way Twiss drives, for example, I don't think he'll be dropping the gearing any time soon. I certainly wouldn't in mine, a couple of times at Wagtail I found myself in 4th gear in the low box, but there again mine's on road tyres.
There's three ways of doing things:

The right way,
The wrong way
And my way, which is like the wrong way but faster.

User avatar
twiss
SCUK Computer Wizard
SCUK Computer Wizard
Posts: 6110
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:28 pm
Location: Birkirkara, Malta
Contact:

Re: engines

Post by twiss » Thu Dec 26, 2013 10:50 am

hahah thanks ed! I will be lowering the gearing slightly by getting rockwatt to make me a rocklobster :)

I'm going to up the boot size to 31" this year so hopefully I should be able to keep my top end and some acceleration :)
Twiss

'93 Suzuki Samurai Sport 1.6 16v SU. Virtual lift, spring under, 31s
'93 Maruti Gypsy MG410

"If brute force doesn't fix your problem, you aren't using enough of it."

Anton
I spend far too much time on here
I spend far too much time on here
Posts: 3859
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:12 pm
Location: London

Re: engines

Post by Anton » Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:01 pm

Edweird wrote:Depends what you're driving, how and why.
Agreed. If I got more torque, I think I'd like a fairey/superwinch overdrive unit from an old landy (yes, yuk, landy parts - but this is from a series I/II/II, before they got all crap and unreliable), so that cruising motorways, I could sit at 70 at 2700rpm instead of about 4000. Then I'd like to line the inside of my SJ with rubber matting to cut down on road noise.

I'd like to (eventually) get my SJ to cruise distances without tiring me out, the same way my Yaris does (70mph at about 2300rpm is much less stressful than 4000rpm). Then I wanna drive it across Europe - although that's going to have to wait until, probably 2015/16.
Twiss wrote:I will be lowering the gearing slightly by getting rockwatt to make me a rocklobster
He can get completely custom, brand new gearsets made for only fractionally more than taking a 410 and 413 set and welding them together. I would *love* to have a 413 high ratio, 4:1 low, and an overdrive. Awesomeness off road, comfortableness and civility (as much as can be afforded by an SJ, anyway) on the road.

Yes, yes please! :)

Pipedream right now. But one day, who knows?
1985 SJ413VX (SJ50V) with SPOA, rear disc brakes, 31x10.5R15 Kaiman Malatesta tyres, an MOT and a lot left to do!

My: Build thread To-do list Pay and Play map

User avatar
Jordi
Bow down before me
Bow down before me
Posts: 7535
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:35 pm
Location: Darlington, Co. Durham

Re: engines

Post by Jordi » Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:04 pm

Anton wrote:
ScottieJ wrote:It's all about the gearing!! Don't forget that, you could have loads of torque but gear it wrong and it won't be useable! Likewise you can run a stock 1.3 with 38" tyres and it still be useable with the right gearing.

Anyway I'm pretty sure the 128lbs ft of the j20a is more than enough in a light Sj with dropped gearing.
Lower gearing serves to increase torque at the wheels, so whilst I agree that loads of torque but the wrong gearing will be a rubbish combo, and a standard 410 could pee all over such a truck - you'd have to get the gearing *very* wrong with 128ft/lb of torque before the vehicle stopped being awesome.

I'm running standard sammy gearing (standard t-case, standard gbox, standard 3.7 diffs) with a standard engine, with 31's. And while it could be better (I have a 410 t-case to go in) it's not that bad.

With double the torque, I probably wouldn't bother with my 410 t-case. I'd drop a J20 in, see how it drove, and then decide. I wouldn't mind slightly higher gearing for m-way speeds.

But for me, the 410 t-case is sitting around waiting to be used, and I have no J20. So I'll drop in the t-case, and hold on to the 413 one in case one day I get more power and decide I *still* want a rocklobster...

Because despite everything I just said, lower gearing is always better offroad! :doublethumbs:
I found it awful. It was like pulling away in 3rd all the time, ragging the tits out of it in each gear to make it move and struggled with top end power. Everytime it looked at a bank you had to change down at least one gear. The standard samurai drive train on 31s was painful on the road.

Once the rock lobster was in it was a million times better, not to mention the massive improvement in fuel consumption.
1988 Samurai - Truck Cab & Tray Back - 1.6 8v & HIF44 - Snorkel - Stack Exhaust - PAS, YJs & 33s - Trussed, Gusseted & Pumpkin Capped Axles - 4.3 R&Ps - 4.16 T/Box - Rear Air Locker - Full Float Back Axle & Discs - RCV Front Shafts - X-Eng Handbrake - Custom Fuel Tank

Post Reply