The beauty of it is, it shouldn't take more than 10-15 minutes to put everything back to "petrol" mode.ScottieJ wrote:I'm intrigued about actually doing it but I think when driving long distance its best to run on an easily available fuel type.
I'd be very wary of sites making claims like that - diesel has less energy per kilo than petrol, which is why light aircraft prefer petrol engines, but diesel's higher efficiency means large jet aircraft (jumbo jets etc) run Jet A1, which is basically a form of diesel. And Konigsegg's run 200hp more on ethanol than Petrol. It's not as bad as he makes it sound, not by a long, long way! And his suggestion that ethanol produces less power than petrol is just totally wrong - tuned right (we can work it out, I'm sure! We're smart fellows!) they make a LOT more than on petrol!ScottieJ wrote:One site stated that you ideally need higher compression and timing tweaks. Also that it is less economical meaning that you will need to be carrying 100s kg of fuel on board, more weight means more chance of breakages and even less economy. Simplicity is the key to a trouble free long distance road trip in my opinion.
This link also doesn't make it sound that appealing
http://www.thecarburetorshop.com/Ethanoluse.htm
With no messing about with compression (Brazil hasn't changed the rods on every car in the country, I can tell you that right now!).
twiss wrote:The problem is that you aren't allowed to take drums of fuel on the ferry or channel tunnel.
Showstopper!
I've crunched numbers and I estimate needing at least 4 55 gallon drums per car. There's no way I could make an endurance fuel tank that large for my SJ, I dunno about you!
Maybe I'll make a bio-still anyway, and just run day to day on ethanol in the UK? Using fruit that would have been thrown away, because DC rightly says that putting good food in your petrol tank isn't really ethical.
Maybe someday I'll do a bioethanol powered trip to Scotland, with the fuel in a lockable trailer (so I can unhook, chain it down, and go play!)